Passing the minimum threshold is not the same as being funded. Most Erasmus+ applications that are rejected were not below the minimum — they scored in the 60–72 range, passed every threshold, and still did not make the funded band because competing applications scored higher. The difference between a 65-point application and an 82-point application […]
The Erasmus Accreditation is one of the most valuable things an Erasmus+ organisation can hold. Once accredited, you receive annual funding for mobility activities without reapplying each year — no full application, no competitive evaluation, no uncertainty. You submit a simplified annual funding request and the grant follows. The gateway to that annual funding is
The Relevance section is the most important part of your KA220 application. It is worth 25 points out of 100 — and it determines whether everything else you write gets read seriously. Evaluators who score a proposal low on Relevance rarely find enough in the other criteria to compensate. A strong Relevance score sets the
Weak objectives are one of the most reliable predictors of a low-scoring Erasmus+ proposal. Evaluators read hundreds of applications — and vague statements like “improve skills,” “raise awareness,” or “foster collaboration” appear in almost all of them. They tell an assessor nothing specific, and they score accordingly. Strong objectives do three things at once: they
The impact section is where many Erasmus+ proposals lose points they should not lose. The content is often there — the project idea is solid, the activities are planned — but it is not written in the language evaluators are trained to recognise. In the 2026 Erasmus+ evaluation framework, Impact accounts for up to 30
