KA210 Small-Scale Partnerships are designed for first-time applicants and smaller organisations — but that does not mean the application is easy to write well. A weak KA210 project description is rejected just as decisively as a weak KA220 application. The lower grant amount does not lower the evaluation bar. This guide walks through every component […]
Intellectual outputs are the most visible — and most scrutinised — deliverables in a KA220 Cooperation Partnership. They are what the project produces for the wider world: the training curriculum, the toolkit, the digital platform, the open educational resource. Evaluators look at them to judge whether the project justifies its budget, whether the partnership is
A work plan template is only useful if you know how to fill it in correctly. Most Erasmus+ applicants find generic templates online, copy the structure, and then write activities that are too vague, assign everything to the coordinator, or produce a timeline that back-loads all the deliverables into the final two months. This guide
The work plan is the operational heart of your Erasmus+ proposal. It is where evaluators check whether your project is genuinely feasible — whether the activities are realistic, the timeline is logical, and each partner has a clear, meaningful role. A strong work plan does not just describe what you will do; it shows that
The Erasmus+ logical framework — often called the logframe — is one of the most misunderstood parts of the application form. Many applicants either skip it, fill it in as an afterthought, or treat it as a simple summary of activities. All three approaches cost points. Done correctly, the logframe is one of the most
